Low Back Pain Case
Chiropractic Referral – Overview of Initial Assessment

Robert Francis, D.C.

Case History:

Samuel Cooper, 68 year old male, initial office visit to PCP with presenting chief complaints of low back pain and non-dermatomal distribution of right sided buttock and posterolateral thigh pain of insidious onset three days duration. Patient has been using heating pad and OTC ibuprofen for three days with no relief. Denied bowel/bladder dysfunction, sensory or motor disturbances below the knee, fever, and weight loss. PCP treated with Rx of NSAIDs and narcotic medication two weeks with instructions for gentle home exercise and heat. Symptoms persist at two weeks follow up. MRI study of the lumbar spine and referral for orthopedic consultation ordered. Orthopedic evaluation revealed upon clinical examination no nerve root tension signs present, diagnostic imaging reviewed and was negative for soft tissue or bony pathology, mild broad based disc bulges appreciated at lower lumbar levels however, no space occupying lesion of clinical significance identified, case determined to be non-surgical and continued conservative care recommended. PCP then referred for four weeks traditional physical therapy intervention of hydroculation, electrostimulation, soft tissue massage and passive assisted stretching.

At six weeks follow up visit, the patient’s symptoms persist and PCP provides referral to the chiropractic service for evaluation. Initial evaluation includes interview regarding nature of onset, chief complaints, Visual Analog Pain Scale completed by the patient, history of previous episodes, past medical history, social history, family history, surgical history, current medications, allergies, a review of systems, orthopedic and neurological examination, review of diagnostic imaging, physical examination and formulation of diagnostic impression.

Clinical findings are positive for articular dyskinesia of the lumbosacral spine bilaterally and provocative tests for SI joints reveal sacroiliac joint dysfunction. There are no true nerve root tension signs present. There are no neurological deficits nor contraindications to SMT. Examination reveals decreased ranges of motion bilaterally of the lumbosacral spine with reduced flexibility. Due to the length of time the patient has experienced antalgic posture and decreased range of motion, there is decreased visco-elasticity and flexibility of the posterior motor units, paravertebral musculature and supporting soft tissues of the spine. There is suggestion of fibroblastic proliferative changes occurring of the paravertebral musculature and peri-articular soft tissues contributing to the restricted ranges of motion and decreased flexibility resulting in deconditioning.

Diagnostic Impression is:
1. Lumbar Radicular Syndrome
2. Lumbosacral Segmental Dysfunction
3. Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
4. Fibromyofascitis/Deconditioning Syndrome

Treatment plan consists of spinal manipulative therapy, a supervised active conditioning rehabilitation program, nutritional supplements and continuation of home exercise program with emphasis on postural mechanics and lifting instructions. Treatment objectives are to reduce symptoms, increase functional capacity, prevent exacerbations and recurrent episodes of LBP.

The frequency and duration of SMT and rehab is daily for two weeks with follow-up evaluation at the end of two weeks to determine frequency and duration of possible continued care. Nutritional supplementation includes Glucosamine and Chondroitin supplements for articular nutrition specifically, and recommendations are made for multi-vitamin and mineral supplements to continue as general nutritional regimen.

At the initial visit after clinical evaluation, the patient receives pre-manipulative hydroculation towards an effort to encourage vasodilation of the supporting soft tissues of the spine and SI joints prior to manipulation. This results in greater visco-elasticity and ease of manipulation for the practitioner and comfort to the patient.

The patient subsequently undergoes passive myofascial release procedures using the lower extremities as long levers to accomplish a thoracolumbar, lumbosacral and pelvic girdle myofascial release. Manipulation of the lumbosacral spine bilaterally and sacroiliac joints bilaterally is performed in the lateral decubitus position bilaterally. The patient then is introduced to an active supervised conditioning program consisting of kinetic exercises beginning with 30 minutes daily increasing to 1 ½ hour daily per patient’s tolerance. An intake Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) is performed to determine current functional capacity and to compare with discharge FCE.

The patient is discharged to follow up with instructions to begin nutritional therapy, continue home stretching program, observe postural mechanics, and return to office per treatment plan, daily for two weeks.

On subsequent office visits, the patient will be assessed with range of motion evaluation and functional assessment through motion palpation of the lumbosacral spine and sacroiliac joints, Visual Analog Pain Scale, and functional capacity evaluation towards an effort to evaluate outcome assessment of treatment objectives.

Rationale:

Spinal Manipulative Therapy is designed to restore biomechanical integrity to areas of articular dyskinesia due to pathomechanical factors including loss of joint mobility, fibroblastic proliferative changes of the supporting soft tissues and neurological and vascular changes resulting from articular dyskinesia.

To achieve reduction in symptoms and decrease in pain, SMT is utilized to recruit the neurological mechanism of collateral inhibition. Collateral inhibition is that part of the arthrokinetic reflex (see Lewit, Dorman, Wyke, Vernon) that inhibits the central transmission of pain through mechanoreceptor collateral fibers innervating the nociceptors in the posterior motor units of the spine and the zygapophyseal capsules.

There are three mechanoreceptors and one nociceptor distributed from the dorsal primary ramus (DPR) innervating each posterior motor unit in the spine. The mechanoreceptors include kinesioreceptors, barrorecceptors, and proprioceptors. As long as the mechanoreceptors’ sensory input to the cord are
within normal limits, a collateral fiber from each mechanoreceptor inhibits nociception. However, when for example, there is abnormal range of motion of the posterior motor units, kinesioreception (sensory input regarding normal or aberrant range of motion) is abnormal and the collateral fiber inhibiting nociception from the kinesioreceptor no longer inhibits the nociception. The threshold for depolarization of the nociceptor is thereby lessened requiring fewer stimuli to depolarize the nociceptor causing pain. If additional stimulation of abnormal sensory input occurs such as a decrease in synovial fluid production due to lack of proper motion of the joint, the intra-articular pressure is changed and the barroreceptor collateral inhibition is interrupted thereby causing even more sensitive state of depolarization of the nociceptor.

The nociceptor input is through the lateral spinothalamic tract, which carries pain and temperature. When fully depolarized, the nociceptor initiates an arthrokinetic reflex resulting a state of hypertonic paraspinal muscle splinting and pain.

An audible “pop” or “crack” often accompanies spinal manipulation. This is the process of cavitation. Cavitation (PV=nrt) occurs when the intra-articular pressure changes. Volume and pressure are inversely proportionate. During SMT, the joint surfaces are separated increasing the volume of the joint space and reducing the intra-articular pressure. The reduction in pressure causes a CO2 gas bubble to come out of the synovial fluid. This causes the audible “pop” much the same as removing the bottle cap from soda pop which reduces the pressure inside the bottle and CO2 comes out of solution making a popping noise.

A longer resting length of the musculature often results post SMT. This is a process of proprioceptiveneurofacilitation (PNF). This occurs when the spindle cell mechanism in the belly of the muscle is stimulated to reset to a new resting length after the actin/myosin heads are gently stretched or pulled apart. Proprioceptive input from the Golgi tendon organ and the spindle cell result is less tonic muscle contraction and compressive forces across joints are reduced. Microadhesions in the myofibrils are frequently reduced by this stretching resulting in more visco-elastic, flexible and functional musculature.

Benefits of SMT include the reduction of peri and intra-articular microadhesions of the posterior motor units, restoration of the pathomechanics in the three-joint complex (two posterior motor units and the intervertebral disc joint), increase in ranges of motion, flexibility and visco-elasticity of the soft tissues and a reduction of fibroblastic proliferation, recruitment of collateral inhibition and maintaining the pressure hierarchy of the intervertebral foramen.

(Pa > Pc > Pv > Pf > Pt)

The pressure in the artery is greater than pressure in the capillary, which is greater than the pressure in the vein, which is greater than the pressure in the funiculus, which is greater than the pressure in the tunnel. (Sunderland)

Definition of Manipulation:

Manipulation consists of accurately determined and specifically directed manual forces to areas of restriction, whether the restriction is in ligaments, muscle or joints; the result of which may be improvement in posture and locomotion, improvement in function elsewhere in the body and the enhancement of the sense of well-being. (American Medical Association, Council on Orthopedics, 1980)

References:

Bogduk N and Engel RM. The menisci of the Lumbar Zygapophyseal Joints. J Anat 1982; 135:795-809.

Giles, LGF. Lumbosacral zygapophyseal joint inclusions. Manual Med 1986;2: 89-92.

Giles LGF and Taylor JR. Innervation of human lumbar zygapophyseal joint synovial folds. Acta Orthopaedica Scand 1987(b);58:43-46.

Haldeman S. The neurophysiology of spinal pain syndromes. In Haldeman S, ed. Modern Development in the Principles of Chiropractic. New York: Appelton-Century Crofts; 1980:119-142.

Kirkaldy-Willis WH. The relationship of structural pathology to the nerve root. Spine 1984;9 :49-52.

Korr, I. The Neurobiological Mechanisms in Manipulative Therapy. New York: Plenum Press, 1978.

Lewit, L. Post isometric relaxation in combination with other methods of muscle facilitation and inhibition. Manual Med 1986; 2.

Singer KP, Giles LGF and Day RE. Intra-articular synovial folds of thoracolumbar junction zygapophyseal joints. Antomica; Record 1990;226;147-152.

Sunderland S. Anatomical perivertebral influences on the intervertebral foramen. In Goldstein M, ed. The Research Status of Spinal Manipulative Therapy. NINCDS Monograph 15. Bethesda, MD; 1975;129-140.

Wyke BD. The neurology of low back pain. In Jayson MIV, ed. The Lumbar Spine and Back Pain, 2nd Ed. Kent: Pitman Medical 1980:265-339.

Wyke BD. The neurology of joints. A review of general principles. Clin Rheumatic Dis 1981;7:223-239.